Then of course we also have our climate-ecology series that wanted an update based on IPCC SR15. Judging by IPCC’s special report on 1.5 degrees the ecological benefits of strengthening the global climate target from 2 to 1.5 degrees are relatively large. For instance insect extinction risk (expressed in this case as species losing over half of their geographic range) declines threefold, while range-deduced survival changes for climate-threatened plant and vertebrate species double.
[*) To illustrate this is highly non-linear: from 1.5 to 2 degrees warming increases 33%, while insect habitat decline increases threefold. Or: from 2 to 1.5 degrees warming is reduced by 25 percent, while insect habitat loss decreases by 67 percent.]
Yes, while the human population keeps growing, climate change is likely to cause various detrimental effects on global agriculture and thereby food security. Like other climate change impacts these effects will increase with the magnitude of the warming, and most likely exponentially so. But what if we manage to limit warming to no more than 1.5 degrees? Here we take a closer look at what IPCC’s recent special report SR15 (‘Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C’) has to say on that topic.
Not just from theoretical thinking, but as calculated outcomes of pioneering climate-crop prediction models – with studies from the early nineties already offering broad patterns of expected changes in agricultural productivity in a warming world. These patterns have of course been fine-tuned by tireless research ever since but already look very familiar to those who follow today’s climate impact research. And that’s something we think deserves our attention…
Part 3 of this series about the impacts of climate change on global agriculture was centred around a climate model study that indicated major global crop belts could experience production declines as a result of increased heat stress. These authors found strong results for rice, maize, soy – but not for wheat.
That got us digging. Never trust good news, when it comes to climate change.
That is not a uniquely African problem, nor a problem that is constrained to the tropics. Paradoxical as it may seem, increasing heat stress is set to create comparable declines in agricultural productivity in colder (subtropical and temperate) climate regions – affecting other global food staples, like wheat, rice and soy…
The impact of 21st century climate change on African agriculture deserves special attention, considering rapid population growth and the fact that the continent is currently already a net importer of agricultural products, while several sub-Saharan countries still depend for a third to over half of their GDP on agricultural output.
Climate change poses an additional stress for these highly dependent nations: for 5 of the 7 most important sub-Saharan food staples (maize, sorghum, millet, groundnut, and cassava) already by the year 2050 significant productivity reductions are expected – decreasing average production between ±22 and ±8 percent, per respective crop:
Today we have decided to start another one – about yet another important field where our climate interacts with another crucial system: agriculture. Our main interest will be net productivity, while keeping in mind we have to feed a growing human population on a decreasing amount of land, considering the simultaneous extinction crisis.
Northwest Europe can expect a couple of winters with relatively frosty conditions, as one key driver of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) is set to favour blockades of westerlies, allowing periods dominated by a supply of cold and relatively dry polar or continental air to flow in from the East or the North.
Current sunspot observations show (the relatively weak) solar cycle 24 has come to a close, entering a new – and possibly prolonged solar minimum. In this article we discuss ramifications for pending European winters.
Based on the developing closure of the current solar cycle (number 24), a relatively long minimum and taking into account a documented time lag these effects may be observed for a relatively large cluster of winters, starting in 2019 and possibly lasting as long as 2026. Do to increased likelihood of a negative phase in the NAO for Northwest Europe these winters may be relatively cool – but not extremely cold:
As we discussed in our previous article, ecologists use the term ‘fitness curve’ – or the synonymous ‘performance curve’ – to describe a climatological bandwidth within which a species can survive, including an optimum value and a critical minimum and maximum: