You would think tropical species like warm weather – and what’s the difference between warm and 2 or 3 degrees warmer. Well, they can be picky. A short appendix to our previous article – a bit of supporting theory as to why tropical insects may be extra vulnerable to the effects of climate change.
Climate news does not get worse: new field data show total insect (and other arthropod) biomass in Central American rainforest has declined 10 to 60 times since the 1970s. Meanwhile also insectivores, like lizards, frogs and birds, are rapidly declining in the Luquillo rainforest of Puerto Rico. The driving force: climate warming.
In our series ‘Understanding Sea Level Rise’ we’ve paid ample attention to positive melting feedbacks, mechanisms that accelerate ice melt and ice sheet dynamics as global temperatures keep rising. Now of course there are also negative feedbacks, like local relative sea level lowering around ice sheets (due to decreasing gravitational pull and isostatic rebound as the ice mass shrinks), a factor that can influence the position of the grounding line of West Antarctic glaciers, the line that separates where these glaciers move across bedrock and where they start floating, forming ice shelves. In general these grounding lines are retreating as a consequence of a warming water wedge and thinning of the ice shelves and the actual ice sheet, however the local relative sea level lowering as a result of this ice loss has the opposite effect, promoting an advance of these grounding lines – therefore acting as a stabilising factor for West Antarctic glaciers, like the Twaites Glacier and Pine Island Glacier, glaciers that are potentially important contributors to acceleration of 21st century sea level rise.
Now we presume you want to know which feedbacks are (likely to be) dominant in this area, the positive or the negative feedbacks. Well, apart from reading the title of this article you can also click it, to learn more…
In face of the Holocene-Anthropocene Mass Extinction conservationists challenge themselves to think of novel biodiversity protection measures. Thinking outside of the box of fenced reserves is literally required, as over 85 percent of Earth’s land does not have nature-protected status, and many stressors, including climate change, also hit home inside nature reserves, decreasing potential refugia in size.
One solution might be to invest in corridors, connecting climate-sturdy refugia, and helping threatened species reach suited habitat.
It’s the end of the year so a good time to evaluate where we’re standing. Our climate-biodiversity series has progressed to episode 43. If you’ve missed it, we highly recommend you start at part 1, preferably under a Christmas tree (in a biodiverse spruce forest) with family. Sadly we cannot guarantee snow.
It’s also a very good time to try to summarise what we’ve been able to learn from the global community of climate researchers, our somewhat classical friends at the Royal Society thought. It’s been a while since the last IPCC report (AR5, 2013/2014) and apart from interesting upcoming IPCC publications about sea level rise and the important 1.5 degrees target it’ll be another long while until the next full-blown climate report will be released (IPCC AR6, 2022).
Let’s bridge that gap, the Royal Society thought – and compile our own climate updates report!
Arctic geese like the Barnacle goose that breed on the Russian tundra and winter in the Netherlands need to increase the speed of their return trips, as the tundra spring starts weeks earlier – possibly skipping their fuelling stops on Baltic islands and along the White Sea, a model study shows.
Many Arctic species are shrinking in size. Say what? Yes, shrinking in size – polar bears included. Is this some clever climate adaptation (as the opposite holds true: larger body sizes are an adaptation to a cold climate), or is it a sign of increasing malnourishment?
Well, the latter – at least in the case of the red knot (Calidris canutus), a long-distance migratory bird that breeds on the Russian Arctic tundra and winters in tropical West-Africa, using temperate zone tidal wetlands as a refuelling stop on their long road.
Under very rare circumstances a spatial mismatch caused by climate change can be a good thing. But before you start betting on compensating one ecological disturbance with another that’s possibly even more dangerous, we think perhaps we should discuss another solution now that forest plagues seem to be increasing everywhere around us.
Climate change can cause a ‘temporal mismatch’ between interacting species, we learned in our previous article. Here’s a short appendix to that piece, illustrating how simultaneously also a spatial mismatch can develop – further promoting population declines and biodiversity loss, especially in Earth’s temperate climate zones.
Migratory birds may seem to be well equipped to cope with the consequences of climate change, because their trait of seasonal migration is of course already an evolutionary adaptation to temperature fluctuations that characterise the seasons of Earth’s temperate climate zones.
But as we have discussed in our special piece about the effects of climate change on temperate zone biodiversity – it’s far more complex, and having evolved under relatively high natural temporal climate variation may actually be a handicap, when trying to adapt to globally rising temperatures under anthropogenic climate change. And birds migrating between Africa and Europe may be ahead of Asian and American species, facing early consequences.